The death of the company car
JOHANNESBURG - The news for those having the use of a company car is not good. The tax on company cars will be raised, creating a significant monthly cash-flow effect on individual taxpayers.
Currently the tax on a company car is a fringe benefit at 2.5% per month on the cash cost of the car, without any maintenance plan and excluding VAT. From March 1 next year it will be raised to 4% a month and include the maintenance plan and VAT. In other words, 48% a year is going to be deemed to be the value of the private use of the car. It is further anticipated that the carbon emissions tax, that was announced in the Budget speech and is due for implementation in September this year, will be a further cost factor to the value of the car (determined value).
Colin Wolfsohn a member of Saica's National Tax Committee and chairman of the Saica Southern Region Tax Committee says the South African Revenue Service (Sars) made the change to prevent arbitrage between travel allowances and the company car.
"With effect from March 1 2010 it increased the rate for someone who receives a travel allowance, where it deemed 80% of the allowance to be subject to employees' tax (previously 60%). The employee when filing his/her personal income tax return now has to submit a logbook detailing the business kilometres travelled for the year in order to be entitled to a claim against the allowance received." he says.
Wolfsohn says the car allowance changes will have significant implications for taxpayers, for example:
- Sars is deeming the vehicle to be used totally for employee's private purpose as a starting point;
- The employee will be taxed on 80% of this 4% on the cost of the car per month (ie, taxed on 3.2% per month) :
- The inclusion of VAT and the cost of the maintenance plan significantly increases the determined value ;
- The employer deducts the tax on this fringe benefit on a monthly basis. The taxpayer can only claim a reduction of the 4% after it has been assessed through a complicated formula;
- The taxpayer will need to keep a DAILY logbook of all business mileage used, which could prove incredibly onerous, as they will need to log each client they go to.
- There is a note in the explanatory memorandum that Sars has the discretion to reduce the 4%, if the private usage is less than 10 000kms a year, but there is no clarity on how this will work;
- It will have a significant cash-flow affect on individual taxpayers because each month they will be taxed on 80% of value of the fringe benefit and only on assessment, which will be four or five months after year end (if they're lucky) will they be able to submit their return and be assessed. After that, there could even be an audit or queries.
Company car tax changes (English)Voorgestelde verandering aan die maatskappy motorbyvoordele belastingwetgewing (Afrikaans) |
There has also been a change to claiming back the tax. Wolfsohn says Sars will still tax you on the fringe benefit at 4% but will reduce it by 20%, so you will be paying tax monthly on 3.2% of the fringe benefit (the private use of a company - owned vehicle).
He adds that if you as the employee pay any expenses, such as fuel costs, licence, insurance or maintenance, at the end of the year you will be able to make a claim against this fringe benefit on which you've been taxed. That too is likely to cause headaches, he says, because what Sars is saying, is depending on the private mileage travelled one will be able to claim back the fuel cost based on rates laid down in a table in the Government Gazette. (For examples on how this will work listen to the podacast in both English and Afrikaans).
Let's hope Sars takes cognisance of the difficulties the proposed changes will create.
Write to Monique Vanek: monique@moneywebtax.co.za
Want more intriguing tax insights? Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here or visit MoneywebTax.co.za Travel allowance section
Services
|
||||||||||






Comments
If SARS is looking for the public to have savings accounts with them what is the interest? And why by the end of each financial year I have to wast 2 days going from one official to the other trying to get the money back? I am all for clumping down on the . .more
by Beata on May 31 2010, 07:03
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
You know it's the right thing to do. The grasping ANC looters won't leave the taxpayers alone until the last productive resident has left - which won't take too long the way things are going.
by Alset on May 31 2010, 07:18
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Of course Government needs to restrict abuse of the system, but isn't this ill timed with Car Dealerships struggling as it is.
by Gary on May 31 2010, 07:36
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
The easiest way around this is to give your employer the monthly petrol slips & maintenance invoices. The employer will reimburse you - everyone is happy. No tax of any kind!
by graham on May 31 2010, 07:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
The SA auto industry seems to be a never ending source of revenue for this kleptocracy.
There's a 35% ad valorem trax on every new vehicle. And a new 5% emissions tax. Then there's 14% VAT. The government's tax share on a new vehicle is 35% 5% . .more
by Henry on May 31 2010, 07:54
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Government is running out of money to steal so they have to find was of stealing from hard working people who do not go around destroying things and making a mokery of civilisation!
by BART on May 31 2010, 08:12
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Very well put and nothing short of terrifying. Surely, now that the honeymoon of 'liberation', massive looting of the family silver and abandoned wild, spending spree is coming to an end, - surely an equally dramatic implosion is imminent and . .more
by Voortrekker on May 31 2010, 09:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
SARS clearly has adopted a polcy of increasing revenue through stealth taxes so that it can still pretend to international investors that tax rates are reasonable. The new PAYE rules are another example, designed to increase penalties and interest icome . .more
by Small Business Owner on May 31 2010, 09:22
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
In Australia my partner's car cost the equivalent of 38% of her annual salary. 25,000 against 65,000.
Here the same car costs her more than 1 years salary. 195,000 against 185,000.
Now you know why.
By the way the Suzuki SX4 is . .more
by Roger on May 31 2010, 09:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
SARS is not benefiting or promoting a culture of disclosure but rather encouraging one of non-disclosure. And analogy. Is there any difference perhaps of a hi-jacker or robber pinting a gun at your head and wanting the contents of your vehicle or the . .more
by Collins on May 31 2010, 09:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
High bloody time that these fringe benefits get taxed. Hopefully these changes will also apply to subsidized vehicles which form part of a civil servants pay package, or will it again be restricted to taxing non-ANC members?
by Mpofu on May 31 2010, 10:09
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
The only thing wrong with this article is the heading. It should have been "The death of the salaried employee".
by Gabriel on May 31 2010, 10:48
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
cant wait to get my hands on it
by DB9 on May 31 2010, 12:14
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Doing it this way SARS is going to tax your benefit out the door within 26 to 28 months. I have mixed feelings about this, but it will most definitely have a negative influence on the retention of good senior personnel in general. However, one must keep . .more
by AFRICAN WARRIOR on May 31 2010, 12:52
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Think SARS should rather tax their cadres entertainment allowances and hotel accommodation allowances and overseas travel. Does mean government ministers also pay this tax on their bling company cars?
by Hein on May 31 2010, 13:50
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
I always thought we were being ripped by dealers here (we pay more for cars than any of the 20 countries I've been to). Turns out its just theft from government, so makes more sense now.
by Dre on May 31 2010, 14:56
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
I think they support the Chinese and Korean car industry...
by Bluegerry on May 31 2010, 22:37
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
our website: now buyy.COM
BEST QUALITY GUARANTEE!!
SAFTY & HONESTY GUARANTEE!!
FAST & PROMPT DELIVERY GUARANTEE!!
Packing: All the products are packed with original boxes and tags also retro cards/ code
numder
A ir jo . .more
by sfrhsdh on June 01 2010, 02:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Good bye SA motor industry and job creation....... We not going to be able to afford a car at this rate. Hope the cabinet are paying 4% a month on all their bling R1million plus cars too!!!
This also creates problems for businesses where staff . .more
by Robbin Hood on June 01 2010, 03:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Stop moaning and pay the "Keiser" what is owned to him...
SARS must also investigate all "self-epmloyed" people. They are getting awsy with murder. I know of a few people who earn more the R1m per annum but still only pay less than R20k tax a . .more
by The Oracle on June 01 2010, 13:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
extend the emissions tax to SAA as well? .... and also to Transnet's many hundreds of diesel locomotives? I smell unfair practises which could be tested in a court.
by BJD on June 01 2010, 14:57
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it
Hi Mom,
Not sure exactly how this will affect you from a monthly cash flow perspective. Just keep the article on file.
by brendamichau@gmail.com on June 22 2010, 10:21
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it